He was fond of suggesting that humans, while capable of foresight, are incapable of using it. This concept has only been amplified over the past two decades in American culture:
- Why do you suppose a bank, any bank, would have ever lent a half million dollars to a 46 year old WalMart associate for thirty years?
- Per my last post, why would people cash-out their retirements, not for paying down debt, but purely for short term material goods?
- Why would they have ever used their houses as ATM machines? Did they not expect they would have to pay the original principal back?
- Why do you suppose we are paving over prime farmlands with sprawl? Are we never assuming that any future generation might find local food production essential?
- Why do wealthy pseudo-environmentalists parade around Boulder, Colorado on bikes, wearing yellow and orange geckos on their bicycle jerseys, but don't give a shit if any geckos are still living in the mountain creeks?
- Why is it that we will harvest, legally or otherwise, our green sturgeons until there isn't a single one left on the planet?
With Sagan's legacy I am apt to consider the consequences of my actions 400 years from today -- a seemingly ridiculous length of time, isn't it? Think of the year 2409. If you and our other 307,289,958 Americans can't even look forward a half dozen years, why should I ever bother thinking four centuries ahead?
I wonder, as Sagan did, if we won't have destroyed ourselves well before 2409.
No comments:
Post a Comment